Tag Archive for: 1080 poison

DOC Response to OIA Request on 1080 Poison Use and Karoro Deaths

Tragedy: 550 black-backed gulls accidentally poisoned in Ōkārito, West Coast during predator elimination project. DOC acknowledges the incident and commits to improving future risk assessments.

Reforming Resource Management in New Zealand: A Call for Balanced Governance

This report explores the challenges of balancing conservation and economic development under New Zealand’s Resource Management Act. It outlines proposed reforms to ensure transparent governance and better management of Crown lands for the benefit of all New Zealanders.

In-depth Response: Independent Scientist, Jo Pollard, Debunks OSPRI’s Claim that a 10-Year Study Proves Forests Remain Vibrant Despite 1080 Poison Usage!

According to OSPRI, the organisation responsible for controlling bovine Tb, 10 years of research have demonstrated “that 1080 can be used to control pests without harming native birds” (Media release, 1/8/23).

Luxons Wildlife Policy

Luxon’s Policy on Wildlife

The National Party openly admits that its new policy to manage wild pigs and selected other animals as game, not pests, aims to win hunters’ votes.

DoC’s Poisoning is Illegal – the Ulva Island Example

Scientist Dr. Jo Pollard says DOC’s actions are negligent since previous DOC poisoning drops on the island, had devastating effects with several native bird species being slashed in numbers.

Frightening Lack of Science Behind Super-Poisoning Plans

For decades now, DoC (NZ’s Department of Conservation) has been finding that nature is very fast to fill a void. DoC uses widely broadcast, broad-spectrum poisons in its battles with unwanted mammals (mice, rats, possums and stoats).

More Kea Non-Science from DoC

The Department of Conservation’s (DoC’s) blatant disregard for science was vivid in October. Articles claiming that “1080 benefits outweigh kea deaths” were published in newspapers and online. This claim was based on comments from DoC’s Tom Belton, who had presented work on kea to the West Coast Conservation Board.

Evidence of breaches of the HZNO Act in the 2007 reassessment of 1080 poison

Under New Zealand’s Hazardous Substances and New Organisms (HSNO) Act (1996), the major aerial spreaders of sodium monofluoroacetate (“1080” poison) (the Animal Health Board and the Department of Conservation) were required to apply to the Environmental Risk Management Authority (ERMA), for permission to continue.

A Look At NZ’s Conservation Science

Supporters of NZ’s conservation by aerial poisoning have commonly defended their position with the statement “Look at the science.”Most of the published science on conservation in NZ is accessed readily, appearing in the NZ Journal of Ecology (NZJE). A browse through the issues from the last couple of years reveals glimmers of hope for ecological management, plus some not so nice things. The following is a quick run through.

Inadequate Consultation of Māori on 1080 Poison

A review of the Department of Conservation’s (DoC’s) consultation with Māori on the aerial use of 1080 poison. Most Māori participants felt uncomfortable with the use of poisons in the environment, protecting the forest biodiversity, while the poison was contradictory to fundamental Māori beliefs.