SCIENTIFIC REVIEWS OF 1080
Scientific reviews provided by the following Independent Scientists: Dr Jo Pollard, BSc (Hons), PhD, Zoology; Quinn and Pat Whiting-O’Keefe, MD, MA, BA; Dr Alexis Mari Peitaki.
Reforming Resource Management in New Zealand: A Call for Balanced Governance
This report explores the challenges of balancing conservation and economic development under New Zealand's Resource Management Act. It outlines proposed reforms to ensure transparent governance and better management of Crown lands for the benefit of all New Zealanders.
Evidence of breaches of the HZNO Act in the 2007 reassessment of 1080 poison
Under New Zealand’s Hazardous Substances and New Organisms (HSNO) Act (1996), the major aerial spreaders of sodium monofluoroacetate (“1080” poison) (the Animal Health Board and the Department of Conservation) were required to apply to the Environmental Risk Management Authority (ERMA), for permission to continue.
Inadequate Consultation of Māori on 1080 Poison
A review of the Department of Conservation's (DoC's) consultation with Māori on the aerial use of 1080 poison. Most Māori participants felt uncomfortable with the use of poisons in the environment, protecting the forest biodiversity, while the poison was contradictory to fundamental Māori beliefs.
Letter to Mike Slater, DOC, Re: Aerial1080 in Arthurs Pass National Park
You have given consent for the business “Vector Control Services” to aerially poison Arthurs Pass National Park, including places that have not been poisoned before, primarily to control rats in order to protect kakariki.
Science against 1080
Will NZ’s Department of Conservation win against rodents and stoats with 1080 poison? Scientist Dr Jo Pollard puts the counter view.
The New Zealand government’s Department of Conservation (DoC) is responsible for managing our land and natural resources for the purposes for conservation.
Response to the Department of Conservation’s reply to “Aerial 1080 poisoning in New Zealand: reasons for concern”
Abstract
A recent review highlighting several reasons for concern…
Aerial 1080 poisoning in New Zealand: Reasons for concern
Abstract
Reasons to be concerned about the widespread use of…
Aerial Monofluoroacetate in New Zealand’s Forests
An appraisal of the scientific evidence
Introduction
Annually,…
A Critical Look at Aerial-Dropped, Poison-Laced Food in New Zealand’s Forest Ecosystems
Each year, New Zealand aerially distributes massive quantities…
A Scientific Evaluation of the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment’s view on 1080
Introduction
In June 2011 New Zealand’s Parliamentary Commissioner…
Overview of scientific and other implications of the New Zealand government’s aerial distribution of food laced with the poison 1080 for pest control
For more than 15 years, the New Zealand Department of Conservation…